ArticleApplied animal behaviour science2026
Development of behavioral observation audiometry tests for companion dogs.
Article in Applied animal behaviour science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Behavioral observational audiometry is applied to study the hearing function of preverbal children aged less than 6 months. We hypothesized that this method could be used to assess hearing threshold in untrained companion dogs. The small number of studies that examine untrained behavioral responses to sounds have not described determination of hearing threshold using this methodology. We designed and optimized a protocol for untrained dogs, performed in a soundproof booth to minimize extraneous noise influence. A handler assessed dog behavioral response to sounds played in ascending intensity on a speaker, positioned orthogonal to the dog; an ethogram was used to define the spectrum of responses. Stimuli included 5 sounds perceived to be ecologically salient to dogs (dog barks, dog whimpers, bird whistle) and 3 warble-tone sounds used in human audiology (0.5, 4, 8kHz frequency). Stimuli were pseudorandomized within each category. The first group of dogs (group 1, n=13) underwent less standardized preparation/acclimation, whereby dogs were not tested at a standard time, and were not fasted. Group 2 dogs (n=12) were fasted, tested in the early morning, and had an expanded acclimation process. Dogs responded more consistently to ecologically salient sounds, and response threshold within the spectrum of ecological sounds varied depending on frequency representation (dog bark response threshold was higher than sounds containing higher frequencies). Response thresholds to warble tone stimuli were higher than in normal humans, and responses were highly variable. Variability in responses was lower in dogs from group 2 compared with group 1. Our optimized protocol for behavioral observation audiometry using ecologically salient stimuli results in consistent testing of response threshold in untrained dogs. Future applications could include the study of the impact of aging, ear pathology, or other disease on hearing thresholds in dogs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.