Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42131740›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2026

Flooding: another abiotic stressor to consider in plant-insect interactions.

Satinderpal Kaur, Esther Ngumbi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Satinderpal KaurDepartment of Entomology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States.
Esther NgumbiDepartment of Entomology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flooding is an increasingly important plant abiotic stress that is intensifying with climate change, yet its ecological implications, particularly for plant- insect interactions remain poorly understood and synthesized. Both flooding and after-flood recovery period disrupt plant growth, physiology, metabolism and biochemistry. Although plant responses to flooding have been extensively studied, the mechanistic links connecting these flooding and after-flood phase induced changes to insect herbivore performance and behavior remain largely unresolved. In this review, we synthesize current knowledge on the pathways through which flooding could potentially re-shape plant-insect interactions. We highlight several interconnected mechanisms, including flooding-induced changes in plant physiology and nutrient status, shifts in phytohormone signaling and plant changes during after-flood recovery phase. These flooding-induced changes can affect insect herbivore growth, performance, oviposition, interactions with natural enemies and ultimately pest outbreaks. Our synthesis reveals that although some individual mechanisms have been documented, the links connecting flooding-induced plant responses to insect outcomes remain largely unresolved. While more foundational evidence regarding flooding-plant-insect interactions is needed, available studies suggest that flooding should be considered as a multi-pathway stress that can reorganize plant metabolic, chemical and nutritional landscape triggering cascading ecological consequences across diverse herbivore guilds. Addressing these gaps will require integrative approaches and will provide a foundation for developing new testable plant- insect interaction hypotheses and advancing ecological theories under changing environmental conditions.

Indexed as

floodinginsect herbivoryplant- insect interactionsplant secondary metabolitesplant volatile compoundsreoxygenation

Identifiers

PMID42131740
PMCPMC13160821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.