Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42131711›Full record

SynthesisPathology oncology research : POR2026

Multimodal prehabilitation for upper gastrointestinal tumors: effects on postoperative morbidity and mortality - a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Csenge Papp, Armand Csontos, Daniel Kehl, Lili Dora Sindler, Andras Vereczkei, Andras Papp

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Csenge PappDepartment of Surgery, Clinical Center, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Armand CsontosDepartment of Surgery, Clinical Center, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Daniel KehlFaculty of Business and Economics, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Lili Dora SindlerDepartment of Surgery, Clinical Center, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Andras VereczkeiDepartment of Surgery, Clinical Center, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Andras PappDepartment of Surgery, Clinical Center, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients suffering from upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancers often present with malnutrition and frailty before undergoing major surgical procedures, which significantly elevates the risk of postoperative complications. Prehabilitation focuses on optimizing a patient's functional capacity before surgery to improve postoperative outcomes. Our goal was to synthesize the effects of prehabilitation on the postoperative outcomes of UGI cancer patients undergoing major surgical intervention using a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A comprehensive systematic search was conducted across the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus databases to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Ten RCTs, encompassing data from 878 patients, were included in the analysis. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) were calculated for dichotomous variables (e.g., incidence of complications), and weighted mean differences were calculated for continuous variables using a random-effects model. Study quality was assessed using the RoB2 and GRADE approaches. Results: The meta-analysis showed a trend toward a lower incidence of minor postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo Grade I-II) in the prehabilitation group. While the common effect model showed significance, the certainty of evidence remains low to very low for most outcomes, suggesting these results should be interpreted with caution. However, a significant reduction was found in Grade III complications when using a common effect model, although no significant differences were detected in Grade IV complications or mortality. Cardiovascular complications and hospital readmission rates also showed no significant disparity. Conclusion: The implementation of prehabilitation in UGI cancer patients is safe and shows a positive trend toward reducing minor postoperative complications, thereby enhancing patient comfort and potentially accelerating recovery time. While the certainty of evidence remains low, further high-quality RCTs with larger patient cohorts are warranted, especially to explore the role of multimodal prehabilitation.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal NeoplasmsPostoperative ComplicationsPreoperative CarePreoperative ExerciseHumansMorbidityRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicERAS protocolmeta-analysispostoperative complicationsprehabilitationupper gastrointestinal cancers

Identifiers

PMID42131711
PMCPMC13160875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.