ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Experimental investigation of sharp-tip microwire-based brain electrode buckling during implantation through dura and pia mater.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Wide use of miniaturized and flexible microwire electrodes faces challenges of wire buckling against the brain membrane layers. The field lacks quantitative understanding of such buckling phenomena, especially on the effective length factor, which is required to determine the wire's critical buckling load. Methods: This study presents an experimental investigation into the buckling behavior of tungsten microwire electrodes during implantation through dura and pia mater layers using a validated multilayer brain-mimicking phantom. Microwires with three diameters (25.4, 50.8, and 76.2 µm) and different tip geometries-including blunt, beveled, and electrochemically (conical) sharpened profiles-were evaluated under controlled axial insertion. Critical buckling length, insertion outcomes (buckled/penetrated), and rupture/buckling force were quantified across the experimental dataset. Buckling behavior was analyzed using the Euler column framework with experimentally estimated effective length factors ( Results: Results indicated that wire diameter strongly influences buckling resistance, with larger diameters yielding quartic (fourth order) higher critical buckling load of the electrode, whereas the corresponding membrane rupture force only increases linearly with the diameter. But smaller microwires tend to anchor better against the brain membrane, generating a more stable wire-membrane interface closer to the ideal pin end condition. Tip geometry also significantly affected rupture force and insertion stability; conical tips dramatically reduced the membrane rupture force with less variance. In general, tip sharpening choice for small microwires should focus on optimizing tips anchoring mechanism and minimizing rupture force uncertainty introduced by tip asymmetry while thick microwires mainly benefit from membrane rupture force reduction. For theoretical prediction of a microwire electrode's critical buckling load based on Euler's buckling equation, unlike conventional fixed-pinned assumption ( Discussion: Designing with ≈ 0.8 provides a conservative estimate that may reduce the risk of buckling under membrane penetration conditions compared to the commonly assumed fixed-pinned value of 0.7. These findings provide quantitative design guidance for optimizing microwire geometry and offer a validated benchtop framework for predicting buckling-limited insertion performance in neural interface applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.