Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42131692›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026

Efficient and accurate medical AI: MediLore and MediOut.

S Mohamed Rayhan, M Hariprasath, K Hemalatha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S Mohamed RayhanSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology - Chennai Campus, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
M HariprasathSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology - Chennai Campus, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
K HemalathaSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology - Chennai Campus, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in medical question-answering (QA) systems requires a careful balance between diagnostic accuracy and computational efficiency. Existing large language models (LLMs) achieve strong performance but are often limited by high memory usage, latency, and inconsistent behavior in handling rare or complex clinical queries. This study addresses these limitations by exploring efficient and robust modeling strategies for medical QA. Methods: Two complementary approaches were developed: MediLore and MediOut. MediLore employs Weighted Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) adapter fusion to integrate domain-specific knowledge into a shared backbone model while reducing computational overhead. MediOut utilizes an output-level ensembling strategy that aggregates predictions from multiple fine-tuned models using semantic similarity-based scoring. Both models were trained and evaluated on clinically curated datasets, including MedQA, PubMedQA, and MedMCQA. Performance was assessed using BLEU, ROUGE, BERTScore, and BioBERT-based similarity metrics. Additionally, 4-bit quantization was applied to optimize deployment efficiency. Results: MediOut achieved the highest performance across semantic evaluation metrics, with a BioBERT F1 score of 0.934 and strong improvements in semantic similarity and contextual alignment. MediLore retained up to 91% of the ensembling accuracy while reducing inference cost to approximately 0.3% of the baseline, significantly lowering latency from 141 seconds to 190 ms. BLEU score improvements were moderate (0.066-0.074), indicating that semantic alignment gains were more substantial than lexical overlap improvements. Discussion: The results demonstrate that MediLore and MediOut provide complementary advantages in medical QA systems. MediLore enables efficient deployment in resource-constrained environments, while MediOut enhances robustness and semantic fidelity for complex clinical queries. The proposed framework highlights the trade-off between efficiency and accuracy, offering practical guidance for selecting appropriate deployment strategies in real-world healthcare applications. These findings contribute to the development of scalable, reliable, and clinically aligned AI systems for biomedical natural language processing.

Indexed as

LoRA adapter fusionmedical question answeringmodel compressionoutput ensemblingsemantic similarity

Identifiers

PMID42131692
PMCPMC13161059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.