Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42131684›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in stroke2026

NIH Stroke Scale and age predict early post-stroke cognitive impairment.

Faddi Saleh Velez, Cameron D Owens, Jennifer Hotson, Andrea Loggini, Ana Luyza Oliveira Santos, Demian Rudyk, Daniela Mercado Pena, Melba Zuniga-Gutierrez, Maria Cedeno-Bruzual, Laura Boada Robayo and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in stroke, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Faddi Saleh Velez *Brain Stimulation and Neurorehabilitation Laboratory, Department of Neurology and Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.
Cameron D Owens *Brain Stimulation and Neurorehabilitation Laboratory, Department of Neurology and Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.
Jennifer HotsonDepartment of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Andrea LogginiBrain and Spine Institute, Southern Illinois Healthcare, Carbondale, IL, United States.
Ana Luyza Oliveira SantosDepartment of Neurology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.
Demian RudykBrain Stimulation and Neurorehabilitation Laboratory, Department of Neurology and Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.
Daniela Mercado PenaBrain Stimulation and Neurorehabilitation Laboratory, Department of Neurology and Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.
Melba Zuniga-GutierrezBrain Stimulation and Neurorehabilitation Laboratory, Department of Neurology and Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.
Maria Cedeno-BruzualBrain Stimulation and Neurorehabilitation Laboratory, Department of Neurology and Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.
Laura Boada RobayoBrain Stimulation and Neurorehabilitation Laboratory, Department of Neurology and Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.
Cheyenne GutierrezDepartment of Neurology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.
Kate SingletonDepartment of Neurology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.
Zyanna StuartDepartment of Neurology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.
Evgeny SidorovDepartment of Neurology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.
Andriy YabluchanskiyBrain Stimulation and Neurorehabilitation Laboratory, Department of Neurology and Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.
Camila Bonin PintoBrain Stimulation and Neurorehabilitation Laboratory, Department of Neurology and Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Acute post-stroke cognitive deficits, which may precede formal post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI), lacks evidence-based interventions or guidelines. Up to one-third of PSCI patients progress to dementia within 5 years. Deficits often emerge within 2 weeks, underscoring the need for early recognition of risk factors to guide prevention and management. However, predictive value of demographic, clinical, and stroke-specific factors remains inconsistent. We evaluated cognitive outcomes (Montreal Cognitive Assessment) at discharge and identified predictors of low function. Methods: In this retrospective study at the University of Oklahoma Medical Center, we reviewed 964 stroke patients, with 168 meeting inclusion criteria. Early PSCI was defined as Montreal Cognitive Assessment < 26 at hospital discharge post-stroke. We calculated prevalence, performed univariable logistic regression, and developed multivariable logistic regression models with and without interaction terms. Results: Patients with Montreal Cognitive Assessment < 26 were older, had longer hospital stays, higher NIH Stroke Scale, and more often discharged to non-home settings. Prevalence of early PSCI was higher with age, longer stays, non-white race, higher NIH Stroke Scale, and non-home discharge. Univariable analyses revealed length of stay, discharge disposition, NIH Stroke Scale, and race as strongest associations. Final multivariable model (NIH Stroke Scale, age, length of stay, discharge disposition) demonstrated NIH Stroke Scale and age as significant predictors, with good discrimination [Receiver Operating Characteristic-Area Under the Curve (ROC-AUC) = 0.79]. Models including interaction terms performed similarly (ROC-AUC = 0.78). Conclusion: Consistent with prior work, NIH Stroke Scale and age emerged as the most robust predictors of early PSCI. Length of stay, discharge disposition, and race were associated with early PSCI in univariable analyses and warrant further evaluation in larger prospective studies.

Indexed as

agedischarge dispositionlength of staymultivariable modelingNIH Stroke Scalepost-stroke cognitive impairment

Identifiers

PMID42131684
PMCPMC13160796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.