Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42131656›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Biofilm Detection in Bacterial Isolates From Musculoskeletal Infections: A Comparative Study of Tissue Culture Plate and Congo Red Agar Methods With Antimicrobial Susceptibility Correlation.

Priyank Trivedi, Shreeraj Talwadekar, Gita Nataraj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Priyank TrivediDepartment of Microbiology, Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, IND.
Shreeraj TalwadekarDepartment of Microbiology, Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, IND.
Gita NatarajDepartment of Microbiology, Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Musculoskeletal infections are a significant cause of morbidity and are frequently associated with prolonged hospital stay, increased healthcare costs, and poor functional outcomes. A major contributing factor to the persistence and recurrence of these infections is the ability of microorganisms to form biofilms. Biofilm-associated bacteria exhibit enhanced resistance to host immune responses and antimicrobial agents, making their detection clinically important. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of biofilm formation in bacterial isolates from musculoskeletal infections, compare phenotypic detection methods, and assess their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns. Methods This prospective study was conducted over a period of 12 months in the Bacteriology division of a tertiary care hospital. A total of 105 non-duplicate bacterial isolates obtained from 90 cases of musculoskeletal infections were included. Biofilm detection was performed using two phenotypic methods: Congo red agar (CRA) and the tissue culture plate (TCP) method, a standardized microtiter plate assay. The TCP method was considered the reference standard. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was carried out using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method in accordance with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Results The most common clinical condition was infected/open fractures (18; 20.0%), followed by trauma (7; 7.8%), osteomyelitis, implant infections, and joint infections (6; 6.7% each), while miscellaneous cases accounted for 37 (41.1%).

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistancebiofilm formationcongo red agarmusculoskeletal infectionstissue culture plate method

Identifiers

PMID42131656
PMCPMC13162171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.