ArticleCureus2026
Pneumatic Nail Gun Injury to the Cardiac Box: A Case Report of Successful Extraction of a Potentially Dangerous Tool.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pneumatic nail guns are widely used in industrial and domestic settings and can cause injuries that may appear minor externally but can be potentially life-threatening. While most injuries involve the extremities, penetrations within the cardiac box carry a significant risk of myocardial or great vessel injury and may present with deceptive clinical stability. A 39-year-old male furniture worker presented to the emergency department after an accidental chest injury with a pneumatic nail gun. Despite a potentially hazardous trajectory through the corpus sterni toward the pericardium, the patient remained hemodynamically stable and asymptomatic. Multimodal imaging was performed to evaluate the extent of the injury. A 2-cm, 23-gauge metallic nail was identified in the paracardiac region. Given the high risk of delayed cardiac complications due to the nail's proximity to the pericardium, surgical removal was planned. The foreign body was successfully extracted via a limited sub-sternal incision under local anesthesia and sedation. Intraoperative fluoroscopy was utilized to ensure precise localization of the small-caliber nail and to minimize iatrogenic trauma during extraction. The patient was discharged uneventfully on the first postoperative day. Penetrating injuries to the cardiac box require a high index of clinical suspicion and prompt radiological evaluation, regardless of hemodynamic status. This case demonstrates that minimally invasive, image-guided extraction using intraoperative fluoroscopy can be safely and effectively performed for small-caliber foreign bodies located near the pericardium, enabling precise removal while minimizing procedural risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.