ArticleCureus2026
Thyroid Storm Presenting With Neurological, Obstetric, and Cardiovascular Features: A Case Series.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thyroid storm is a rare but life-threatening endocrine emergency that can present with a wide range of clinical manifestations, which may delay diagnosis, particularly in atypical cases. We present a case series of three patients with thyroid storm to highlight its clinical variability and management challenges. We describe three patients with thyroid storm who presented with distinct clinical patterns, including neurological involvement with seizures, an obstetric trigger with severe systemic deterioration, and a case complicated by atrial fibrillation and ischemic stroke. In all cases, a precipitating factor was identified, and treatment was initiated with beta-blockers, corticosteroids, and methimazole. Although scoring systems such as the Burch-Wartofsky Point Scale were useful, they did not always fully reflect clinical severity, particularly in the presence of comorbid conditions. All patients showed clinical improvement with treatment. These cases illustrate the clinical variability of thyroid storm and the importance of clinical judgment in diagnosis. They also support the use of methimazole as a reasonable therapeutic option, within the limitations of this case series, in settings where propylthiouracil is not available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.