ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Exploring the use of a digital visual collaboration platform in pediatric clinical teaching: medical students' experiences and perceptions-cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Digital visual collaboration tools are increasingly used in clinical education to promote engagement, reasoning, and interactive learning. Miro, a digital workspace, supports student-centered, case-based learning. This study aimed to assess medical students' satisfaction, perceptions, and experiences with Miro during a pediatric clinical module. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among fifth-year medical students at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Tabuk. Miro was implemented as a learning approach in small-group pediatric case-based sessions. The self-administered questionnaire included 29 items across six domains: perception of the learning method, satisfaction with the learning experience, experience with Miro as a tool, cognitive reasoning and analytical processes, self-directed learning, and perceived challenges. Descriptive and comparative analyses were performed, including gender-based comparisons using Mann-Whitney Results: A total of 136 students (76 females, 60 males) participated. Overall, students reported positive perceptions and satisfaction with Miro, with mean scores exceeding 4.0 on most items. The highest-rated statements were "The contents and composition of the topic were suitable to the students' level" (mean = 3.93 ± 1.00) and "I was able to learn how to build a hypothesis about the case scenario" (mean = 3.86 ± 0.90). Most students rated analytical and reasoning tasks as reasonable in difficulty. Gender analysis revealed significant differences in perceived barriers and educational value: males reported higher perceived engagement, whereas females more often cited vague goals and limited resources. Conclusion: Miro was positively perceived by students as a visual learning platform in pediatric clinical modules. While students of all genders found it beneficial, gender-based disparities in experience and perceived challenges underscore the need for inclusive instructional strategies and targeted support to optimize digital learning environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.