Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42131617›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Exploring the use of a digital visual collaboration platform in pediatric clinical teaching: medical students' experiences and perceptions-cross-sectional study.

Laila AlBishi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Laila AlBishiDepartment of Pediatric, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Digital visual collaboration tools are increasingly used in clinical education to promote engagement, reasoning, and interactive learning. Miro, a digital workspace, supports student-centered, case-based learning. This study aimed to assess medical students' satisfaction, perceptions, and experiences with Miro during a pediatric clinical module. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among fifth-year medical students at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Tabuk. Miro was implemented as a learning approach in small-group pediatric case-based sessions. The self-administered questionnaire included 29 items across six domains: perception of the learning method, satisfaction with the learning experience, experience with Miro as a tool, cognitive reasoning and analytical processes, self-directed learning, and perceived challenges. Descriptive and comparative analyses were performed, including gender-based comparisons using Mann-Whitney Results: A total of 136 students (76 females, 60 males) participated. Overall, students reported positive perceptions and satisfaction with Miro, with mean scores exceeding 4.0 on most items. The highest-rated statements were "The contents and composition of the topic were suitable to the students' level" (mean = 3.93 ± 1.00) and "I was able to learn how to build a hypothesis about the case scenario" (mean = 3.86 ± 0.90). Most students rated analytical and reasoning tasks as reasonable in difficulty. Gender analysis revealed significant differences in perceived barriers and educational value: males reported higher perceived engagement, whereas females more often cited vague goals and limited resources. Conclusion: Miro was positively perceived by students as a visual learning platform in pediatric clinical modules. While students of all genders found it beneficial, gender-based disparities in experience and perceived challenges underscore the need for inclusive instructional strategies and targeted support to optimize digital learning environments.

Indexed as

clinical reasoningdigital toolsmedical educationMiro apppediatric modulestudent satisfactionvisual learning

Identifiers

PMID42131617
PMCPMC13160855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.