ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Development and validation of a predictive model for short-term symptom relief after organophosphate poisoning.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute organophosphate (OP) poisoning outcomes vary significantly despite standard atropine/pralidoxime (PAM) therapy. Early identification of patients likely to improve rapidly could optimize resource allocation and individualized care. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 138 adult acute OP poisoning cases (2018-2023). Patients were randomly split into training ( Results: Four independent predictors were identified: baseline PSS, admission serum cholinesterase, admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, and major comorbidities. The nomogram showed strong discrimination (optimism-corrected AUC 0.930 in the training cohort; AUC 0.905 in the validation cohort) and good calibration (MAE 0.034 and 0.066). Decision-curve analysis showed positive net benefit over treat-all and treat-none across clinically relevant thresholds. Conclusion: We developed and validated a practical nomogram predicting 48-h symptom relief in acute OP poisoning. This tool can enhance early risk stratification, guide clinical decisions, and support efficient ICU resource utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.