ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
MMPro-HIP: multimodal progressive fusion model for elderly HIP fracture risk prediction.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives: Hip fractures, often termed the "last fracture in life," are associated with a 20-30% one-year postoperative mortality and about 50% of survivors endure permanent disability and loss of independence. Early, accurate risk prediction enables timely preventive measures and individualized care, reducing incidence. However, older adults frequently present with mobility limitations, multiple chronic comorbidities, and heterogeneous hospital resources, leading to missing clinical or imaging data. Consequently, developing hip-fracture risk models robust to incomplete data is essential to improve generalizability, feasibility, and clinical decision-making in resource-constrained settings. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 1,287 elderly clinical records from Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, including 643 patients with hip fractures and 644 controls without fractures. Baseline variables showed notable between-group differences in sex, age, fracture history, hemoglobin levels, and bone mineral density (BMD). A global machine learning model was developed using complete-case data, with performance evaluated by accuracy and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). To address the frequent problem of modular missing data, we further proposed a progressive fusion model (MMPro-HIP). This model integrates features from multiple modalities stepwise, allowing for robust prediction despite incomplete information. Results: The global model reached an accuracy of 84.67% and an AUC of 0.8064. Key predictors included age, sex, BMD, and cholesterol, with the section modulus within BMD emerging as an important but previously underutilized factor. The MMPro-HIP model achieved superior performance on the independent test set, with an accuracy of 90.94% and an AUC of 0.9423. By capturing cross-modal interactions, this approach outperformed the global model. Ablation experiments confirmed the contribution of demographic variables (79.06%) and BMD measures (-6.71%) to predictive accuracy. Conclusion: MMPro-HIP showed favorable predictive performance for hip fracture risk assessment in older adults with incomplete clinical data in this single-center retrospective cohort. BMD contributed the largest performance gain, while basic demographic information alone still provided useful baseline stratification. These findings suggest that progressive multimodal fusion with residual correction may be a practical strategy for structured clinical prediction under modular missingness, although external validation is still needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.