Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42131550›Full record

ArticlePOCUS journal2026

Current Use and Barriers to POCUS in Women's Health: A National Survey of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.

Megha Gupta, Sarah Hanson, Stephen Wagner, Amir A Shamshirsaz, Angela Ranzini, Michael J Mader, Nilam J Soni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in POCUS journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Megha GuptaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Sarah HansonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Stephen WagnerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Amir A ShamshirsazDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Angela RanziniDivision of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MetroHealth System, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Michael J MaderResearch Service, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Nilam J SoniMedicine Service, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, USA.

Funding

HSRD VA I50 HX002263
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) has become an invaluable tool in healthcare across multiple disciplines. For the past 30 years, obstetricians and gynecologists in many hospitals have had access to ultrasound equipment and commonly utilize it in labor and delivery suites and emergency rooms for a broad range of conditions. POCUS can be divided into gynecologic and obstetric applications-the latter can be further categorized into fetal POCUS and maternal POCUS. While fetal POCUS primarily assesses the fetus, maternal POCUS is crucial for evaluating conditions that impact a mother's health during pregnancy, intrapartum, and postpartum, such as cardiopulmonary status. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of maternal POCUS for timely diagnosis and management, which can ultimately reduce maternal morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to characterize the current use of maternal POCUS, identify barriers to its adoption, and explore opportunities for greater integration into clinical practice nationally among Women's Health (WH) departments within the Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted from June 2019 to March 2020 through a web-based survey distributed to all VA medical centers. The survey was first distributed to all chiefs of staff about facility-level POCUS use, training, competency, and policies. A follow-up survey was sent to all WH chiefs to obtain service-level data on diagnostic and procedural POCUS use, training needs, workflows, and equipment availability. Statistical analysis utilized the Chi-squared test to uncover associations between POCUS use and various group characteristics, with a significance threshold of p<0.05. Results: Response rates were 100% among chiefs of staff (n = 130) for the facility-level survey and 77% among WH chiefs (n = 61) for the service-level survey. Diagnostic or procedural POCUS was used by only 30% of all WH groups. The most frequently reported diagnostic applications included assessment of the uterus (23%), ovaries (23%), and intrauterine pregnancy (16%). The most frequently identified procedural application identified was intrauterine device insertion, reported by 23% of the groups. Key barriers to POCUS use included a lack of equipment (56%), lack of trained clinicians (49%), insufficient funding for training (28%), and lack of support staff (26%). While 69% of WH chiefs expressed support for POCUS training, only 23% of chiefs reported having a structured process for obtaining POCUS training for their clinicians. This discrepancy underscores the need for enhanced education and awareness initiatives to align clinician perspectives with the growing benefits of POCUS in clinical practice. Conclusion: This national survey highlighted the low utilization of maternal POCUS among WH clinicians in the VA healthcare system and pointed to critical barriers, including equipment shortages and training gaps. Addressing these barriers through enhanced training, resource allocation, and leadership support is essential to fully leverage the potential benefits of POCUS use in maternal care. Future efforts should focus on evaluating the impact of improved POCUS training and investment in POCUS infrastructure on maternal health outcomes.

Indexed as

BarriersMaternal point-of-care ultasoundObstetricsPOCUSTraining

Identifiers

PMID42131550
PMCPMC13161786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.