Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42131547›Full record

ArticlePOCUS journal2026

Modified Venous Excess Ultrasound (mVExUS) in the Prediction of Ventilator Weaning Failure: a Cohort Study.

Tiago Hermes Maeso Montes, Wagner Luis Nedel, Márcio Manozzo Boniatti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in POCUS journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tiago Hermes Maeso MontesDepartment of critical care, Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Wagner Luis NedelDepartment of critical care, Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Márcio Manozzo BoniattiDepartment of critical care, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ventilator weaning failure is a significant challenge in critically ill patients, and venous congestion has emerged as a potentially modifiable factor influencing weaning outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the association between venous congestion identified by the modified venous excess ultrasound (mVExUS) score and ventilator weaning failure in critically ill patients. Methods: We prospectively enrolled patients aged 18 years or older who had received mechanical ventilation (MV) for at least 48 hours. A mVExUS score, excluding the intrarenal component, and a lung point of care ultrasound (POCUS) assessment were performed before a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). The primary outcome was weaning failure, defined as a failed SBT or the need for MV (invasive or non-invasive) within 72 hours. Results: Among 111 patients, 57 (51.4%) experienced ventilator weaning failure. Ventilator weaning failure occurred in 63.9% of patients with mVExUS scores of 2-3, compared to 45.3% with scores of 0-1 (p = 0.067). In adjusted analyses, mVExUS scores of 2-3 were independently associated with weaning failure (OR 2.756, p = 0.03). A post-hoc analysis combining mVExUS and lung POCUS scores showed a weaning failure incidence of 76.5% in patients with mVExUS scores of 2-3 and lung POCUS scores ≥7, compared to 34.1% in patients with mVExUS scores of 0-1 and lung POCUS scores <7 (p = 0.002). Conclusion: mVExUS scores of 2-3 are significantly associated with a higher risk of weaning failure and post-extubation respiratory failure. Combining VExUS and lung POCUS scores may enhance the assessment of weaning readiness in critically ill patients.

Indexed as

Critically illLung ultrasoundMechanical ventilationPOCUSVExUSWeaning

Identifiers

PMID42131547
PMCPMC13161785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.