ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026
Kano Model-Based Analysis of Medical and Nursing Service Needs of Fracture Patients and Their Families.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To explore the structure of medical and nursing service needs of fracture patients and their families via the Kano model, clarify key service attribute categories and improvement priorities, and provide evidence for optimizing orthopedic service systems. Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 300 patients and their family members from January 2025 to October 2025. A self-designed Kano questionnaire was used to investigate service satisfaction and demand intensity. Kano attribute classification and Better-Worse coefficient analysis were performed. Data were double-entered and verified using Epidata 3.1, and statistically analyzed using R software. Results: Among the 25 service items, 5 were Must-be (M), 5 were One-dimensional (O), 6 were Attractive (A), and 3 Reverse (R). "Dietary guidance" had the highest satisfaction (75.24%), while "Privacy protection" was the lowest (18.08%). In the Better-worse quartile strategy diagram, there were 14 expected attributes (Quadrant I) (56.00%), 7 attractive attributes (Quadrant II) (28.00%), and 4 indifferent attributes (Quadrant IV) (16.00%). Patients had a stronger demand for health education than family members, and demands varied significantly by age. Conclusion: The Kano model analysis can effectively identify and classify the demand attributes of fracture patients and their families, supporting precise quality improvement in medical and nursing services. Prioritizing Must-be attributes and Improvement Area items, and providing personalized services based on group differences, can significantly enhance service quality and satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.