Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42131494›Full record

ArticleJournal of research in nursing : JRN2026

The I-DECIDED

Thiago Lopes Silva, Gillian Ray-Barruel, Amanda Ullman, Mari Takashima, Sabrina de Souza, Jefferson Wildes da Silva Moura, Sayonara Stéfane Tavares de Moura, Luciano Marques Dos Santos, Patrícia Kuerten Rocha

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research in nursing : JRN, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Thiago Lopes SilvaPostdoctoral Research Fellow.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6310-5825
Gillian Ray-BarruelSenior Research Fellow, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland, Australia.
Amanda UllmanProfessor, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8860-5319
Mari TakashimaResearch Fellow, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1167-9106
Sabrina de SouzaResearch Fellow, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3628-0134
Jefferson Wildes da Silva MouraRegistered Nurse and PhD candidate, Nursing Department, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7192-1099
Sayonara Stéfane Tavares de MouraRegistered Nurse and PhD Candidate, Nursing Department, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2285-9345
Luciano Marques Dos SantosProfessor, Health Department, Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7866-6353
Patrícia Kuerten RochaProfessor, Nursing Department, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8347-1363

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Proper documentation of peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and care is essential for improving outcomes related to its use. However, adherence to peripheral intravenous catheter documentation remains low, despite nursing documentation being essential for continuity of care, timely identification of complications and safe clinical decision-making. Aim: To determine the impact of the I-DECIDED Methods: A quasi-experimental interrupted time series study. The sample included 810 peripheral intravenous catheters documentation observations (405 pre- and 405 post-intervention) performed by 27 nursing staff. Data were collected at six points: three pre- and three post-intervention. Data were analysed using the Generalised Estimating Equations model. Results: After the use of the I-DECIDED Conclusion: The I-DECIDED

Indexed as

catheterisationdocumentationpaediatric nursingpatient safetyperipheral

Identifiers

PMID42131494
PMCPMC13161040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.