Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42131455›Full record

ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology2026

Tolerability and efficacy of simultaneously integrated boost radiotherapy in head and neck cancer treatment.

Gyöngyi Kelemen, Emese Fodor, Melinda Csenki, Melánia Fuszkó, Árpád Puskás, Emőke Borzási, Zsuzsanna Besenyi, Viktor Paczona, Ferenc Borzák, László Szakács and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Gyöngyi KelemenDepartment of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Emese FodorDepartment of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Melinda CsenkiDepartment of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Melánia FuszkóDepartment of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Árpád PuskásDepartment of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Emőke BorzásiDepartment of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Zsuzsanna BesenyiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Viktor PaczonaDepartment of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Ferenc BorzákDepartment of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
László SzakácsDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Róbert PaczonaDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Zoltán VargaDepartment of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Judit OláhDepartment of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Katalin HideghétyDepartment of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Radiotherapy (RT) plays a crucial role in managing head and neck tumors. A key challenge is balancing optimal tumor control with the preservation of healthy tissues. Our study aimed to evaluate the key benefits and complications of head and neck RT using simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) compared to conventional fractionation. Materials and methods: This study included patients with head and neck cancers who received definitive or postoperative RT between September 2022 and October 2023 at the Department of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged. A total of 66 patients were analyzed, with 33 receiving SIB and 33 treated with sequential boost (SB). All patients underwent adaptive RT with or without concurrent cisplatin or cetuximab therapy. Demographic and pathological data were comparable between the groups. Acute toxicities, local control outcomes at three months post-RT, and tumor volume changes at two-thirds of the RT course were assessed. Results: No significant differences were observed in dysphagia, radiomucositis, and xerostomia between the two groups. The incidence of grade 2-3 radiodermatitis was significantly higher in the SB group (42.4% Conclusions: The SIB technique can be safely and effectively used in head and neck RT, offering reduced acute skin toxicity and maintaining proper tumor response. These early results indicate that SIB is a favorable option for managing head and neck cancers.

Indexed as

head and neck cancerradiodermatitisradiomucositissimultaneously integrated boost

Identifiers

PMID42131455
PMCPMC13167010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.