ArticleGut microbiome (Cambridge, England)2026
Machine learning identifies differences between breast milk and formula in the gut microbiome.
Article in Gut microbiome (Cambridge, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we analysed differences in the infant gut microbiome between breastfed and formula-fed infants using novel machine learning techniques. Breast milk, rich in bioactive agents, supports microbiota composition and immune development, while formulas aim to replicate its nutritional profile. We applied a methodology combining the DADA2 pipeline for 16S rRNA sequencing with the Recursive Ensemble Feature Selection (REFS) algorithm for biomarker discovery. We analysed three publicly available 16S rRNA datasets: PRJNA633365 (70 stool samples from China), PRJDB7295 (40 stool samples from the Philippines), and PRJNA562650 (40 stool samples from China). The discovery dataset (PRJNA633365) revealed 16 significant taxa out of 1,227, validated across the other two datasets. Next, we compared REFS performance with another feature selection algorithm, SelectKBest. Finally, we conducted a literature review to explore links between identified taxa and medical conditions. Additionally, we used MicrobiomeAnalyst to examine associations with diseases, diet, and lifestyle. Our results show differences in the bacterial composition between breastfed and formula-fed infants, and these findings were validated in two independent datasets. Future research should explore the functional roles of these taxa and consider regional and dietary variability to enhance understanding of microbiome dynamics and long-term health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.