ReviewTzu chi medical journal
Blood-based predictive biomarkers for preterm birth: Redefining risk stratification in modern perinatal care.
Review in Tzu chi medical journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) remains a leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality worldwide, with current screening tools - such as cervical length measurement and fetal fibronectin - showing limited predictive value, particularly in asymptomatic women. Recent advances in molecular diagnostics have identified blood-based biomarkers that capture transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic changes preceding labor. This systematic review synthesizes recent high-quality studies published between 2018 and 2025, selected through a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses-guided search and appraised using AMSTAR-2 and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Transcriptomic signatures, including cell-free RNA profiles, demonstrate area-under-the-curve (AUC) values up to 0.94 when measured in early gestation (10-20 weeks). Proteomic panels targeting inflammatory mediators and matrix-remodeling proteins achieve AUCs of 0.80-0.89, while metabolomic assays identify arginine derivatives and lipid shifts with AUCs of 0.78-0.84. Multiomic models integrating these molecular layers with machine-learning algorithms further improve prediction, reaching AUCs above 0.93 across diverse cohorts. Optimal sampling windows range from 10 to 24 weeks, with the strongest evidence for use in high-risk women or as part of universal mid-trimester screening. Emerging clinical pathways outline how these assays could integrate into prenatal care to enable timely interventions such as progesterone therapy, cervical cerclage, or intensified monitoring. Key barriers to implementation include assay standardization, cost, regulatory approval, and ethical considerations in patient counseling. Standardized protocols, multicenter validation, and equitable deployment strategies will be critical to translating these promising technologies into practice. If successfully implemented, blood-based predictive models could help shift obstetric care toward more personalized and preventive management of sPTB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.