Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42131409›Full record

ArticleTzu chi medical journal

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for inoperable primary and recurrent cholangiocarcinoma: A single-institution retrospective analysis.

Atsuto Katano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tzu chi medical journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Atsuto KatanoDepartment of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Cholangiocarcinoma is a rare and aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis, particularly in patients who are not candidates for surgical resection. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) combines high-dose radiation delivery with meticulous spatial accuracy, allowing for effective local control in a variety of solid tumors. However, clinical data supporting the use of SBRT in cholangiocarcinoma are limited, and this study aimed to investigate the feasibility, safety, and oncologic outcomes of SBRT. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 21 consecutive patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma who received SBRT between May 2012 and February 2024 at our institution. Eligible patients had no prior liver- or biliary-directed radiotherapy and no distant metastases. Target delineation was performed using four-dimensional computed tomography or breath-hold techniques. SBRT doses ranged from 50 to 60 Gy in 7-10 fractions. Results: The cohort included 16 men and 5 women with a median age of 76 years (range: 58-86). Thirteen patients (62%) had previously undergone surgery and were treated for recurrent disease. At a median follow-up of 9.5 months, the 1-year local control rate was 77.2%. For the entire cohort, the 1-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were 47.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 24.5%-67.4%) and 32.4% (95% CI: 13.4%-53.2%), respectively. Three patients (14.2%) experienced Grade 3 or higher adverse events, consisting of one gastric ulcer and two instances of biliary stricture. Conclusion: SBRT may represent a feasible treatment approach for patients with inoperable cholangiocarcinoma, showing encouraging local control with acceptable toxicity in this small cohort. However, given the study's limitations, these findings should be regarded as exploratory.

Indexed as

CholangiocarcinomaStereotactic body radiotherapyUnresectable tumor

Identifiers

PMID42131409
PMCPMC13167086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.