ArticleTzu chi medical journal
Diagnostic performance of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in periprosthetic joint infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Tzu chi medical journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most severe complications following joint replacement surgery, leading to significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare burden. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has emerged as a potential biomarker for diagnosing PJI due to its simplicity and cost-effectiveness. However, the diagnostic utility of NLR remains unclear, warranting a systematic review and meta-analysis. Materials and Methods: This study systematically reviewed 23 studies involving 11,657 patients, of whom 2061 had PJI. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic performance of NLR. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on the type of arthroplasty (total knee or hip replacement) and PJI classification (acute or chronic). Publication bias was assessed using Deeks' funnel plot. Results: The pooled sensitivity and specificity of NLR for diagnosing PJI were 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66-0.76) and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.65-0.75), respectively. The AUC was 0.76, demonstrating moderate diagnostic accuracy. Subgroup analyses revealed consistent findings across acute and chronic PJI cases, as well as total knee and hip arthroplasties. NLR cutoff values ranged from 2.1 to 3.82 across studies, reflecting a lack of standardization. Conclusion: NLR is a promising biomarker for diagnosing PJI, offering moderate diagnostic accuracy and practical advantages due to its accessibility and cost-effectiveness. However, standardization of NLR thresholds and further validation in prospective studies are needed to optimize its clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.