Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42131376›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada2026

Diagnosis, treatment, and prophylaxis of

Connor Prosty, Bennet Desormeau, Todd C Lee, Emily G McDonald

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Connor ProstyFaculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Bennet DesormeauFaculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Todd C LeeDivision of Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Emily G McDonaldDivision of Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A recent international survey of clinician practices in the management of Methods: Data from Canadian participants of an international survey of clinician CDI practices were extracted. Practice alignment with the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease (AMMI) Canada CDI treatment guidelines was assessed. CDI practices were compared across provinces using the Fisher exact test with a simulated Results: A total of 112 responses were obtained from eight provinces. Vancomycin (85.3% for first episode), vancomycin pulse and taper (P-T) (61.8% and 32.4% for first and second recurrences, respectively), and fecal microbiota transplant (32.4% for third recurrence) were preferred treatment strategies. Practice alignment with the AMMI Canada CDI guidelines for the treatment of recurrences was low (range 23.5%-32.4%, depending on the recurrence number). With respect to secondary CDI prophylaxis during antibiotic reexposure, there were interprovincial differences in the perceived indication ( Conclusion: Despite the availability of national guidelines, we found significant heterogeneity in practice across Canada, often not aligned with guideline recommendations. These findings underscore the need for a platform trial comparing treatment strategies and a trial to establish the efficacy of secondary prophylaxis.

Indexed as

Clostridioides difficilefidaxomicinprophylaxistreatmentvancomycin

Identifiers

PMID42131376
PMCPMC13167151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.