ArticleJournal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada2026
Using a planetary health lens to quantify intravenous use of bioequivalent antimicrobials when oral administration is feasible.
Article in Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Health care accounts for 4.6% of Canada's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, 25% of which comes from medications. Antimicrobials with high bioavailability offer no additional benefit when given intravenously, except when oral (PO) administration is not feasible. Intravenous (IV) formulations have a higher carbon footprint than their PO counterparts. IV-to-PO switch strategies benefit patients and the health care system by reducing line-related adverse events, nursing time, length of hospital stay, and costs and can also reduce carbon emissions.Our primary objective was to quantify IV use of bioequivalent antimicrobials when PO administration is feasible. Secondary objectives were to determine GHG emissions and antimicrobial costs associated with unnecessary IV use of bioequivalent antimicrobials. Methods: We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional study of hospitalized adults who received IV azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, cotrimoxazole, fluconazole, levofloxacin, linezolid, metronidazole, moxifloxacin, or voriconazole at Vancouver General Hospital on five dates. We determined the proportion of patients receiving these antimicrobials who met criteria for PO administration. We also applied a life cycle assessment (LCA) to assess the GHG emissions of the antimicrobial drug delivery systems using OpenLCA with the Ecoinvent database. Using these data, we calculated the GHG emissions and costs associated with unnecessary IV use. Results: In total, 128 patients were identified. Seventy-eight (61%) met IV-to-PO switch criteria on the audit dates. Most eligible patients were admitted to general surgery, internal medicine, or critical care. The antimicrobial with the highest IV-to-PO switch eligibility was metronidazole (51%), most often prescribed for intra-abdominal infections. Over the five study dates, potential GHG savings were about 80,000 gCO Conclusion: Over 60% of patients receiving highly bioavailable IV antimicrobials were eligible for PO therapy, highlighting an opportunity to optimize prescribing. Promoting an IV-to-PO switch can improve patient outcomes and reduce environmental impact, supporting both patient-centred care and planetary health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.