Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42131346›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026

Predicting response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer using longitudinal DCE-MRI deep learning integrated with tumor microenvironment data.

Lan Yan, Xianming Huang, Lan Liu, Ao Wu, Yingyi Luo, Hao Li, Shaofeng Yi, Tenghua Yu, Qiao Zeng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lan Yan *Department of Radiology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital & Institute, Jiangxi Clinical Research Center for Cancer, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, China.
Xianming Huang *Department of Pathology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital & Institute, Jiangxi Clinical Research Center for Cancer, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, China.
Lan Liu *Department of Radiology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital & Institute, Jiangxi Clinical Research Center for Cancer, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, China.
Ao WuJiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Yingyi LuoJiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Hao LiJiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Shaofeng YiJiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Tenghua YuDepartment of Breast Surgery, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital & Institute, Jiangxi Clinical Research Center for Cancer, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, China.
Qiao ZengDepartment of Radiology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital & Institute, Jiangxi Clinical Research Center for Cancer, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, JXHC Key Laboratory of Tumour Metastasis (Jiangxi Cancer Hospital), Nanchang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study developed and validated a multimodal fusion model to enable the early and accurate prediction of pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in breast cancer. The model integrates deep learning (DL) features derived from longitudinal dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) acquired early during treatment, peripheral blood inflammatory (PBI) indices, and baseline levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Methods: A total of 262 breast cancer patients receiving NAT were retrospectively enrolled and divided into a training cohort (n=183) and a validation cohort (n=79) based on the time of surgery. Deep learning models (Pre-NAT DL and Post-2nd-NAT DL) were constructed using features extracted from pre-treatment (baseline) and post-second-cycle DCE-MRI images, respectively. An immune-inflammation model was built using baseline TILs and dynamically changing PBI indices. A clinical model was developed based on baseline clinicopathological characteristics. Finally, a combined model was constructed by integrating features from all the aforementioned modalities. The models were developed using various machine learning algorithms, and their predictive performance was assessed and compared. Results: In the validation cohort, the combined model achieved superior predictive performance, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.90 and specificity of 95%. Its performance was significantly better than that of any single-modality model. The Post-2nd-NAT DL model (AUC = 0.85) outperformed the Pre-NAT DL model (AUC = 0.75), confirming the critical predictive value of deep learning features from early-treatment DCE-MRI. The immune-inflammation model also exhibited independent predictive capability (AUC = 0.73). Conclusion: The combined model integrating deep learning features from early longitudinal DCE-MRI, dynamic systemic inflammatory indicators, and baseline TILs significantly enhances the early prediction of pCR to NAT in breast cancer. This multimodal fusion strategy offers a potential tool to aid personalized treatment planning in breast cancer patients undergoing NAT.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningNeoadjuvant TherapyTumor MicroenvironmentAdultDynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedPathologic Complete ResponsePredictive Learning ModelsRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomebreast cancerdeep learningdynamic contrast-enhanced MRIneoadjuvant therapypathological complete responsetumor-infiltrating lymphocytestumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID42131346
PMCPMC13161091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.