Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42131288›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2026

Pediatric-specific computer-aided detection of lung nodules in computed tomography scans.

Russell C Hardie, Dylan Flaute, Barath N Narayanan, Andrew T Trout, Jonathan R Dillman, Pradipta Debnath, Alexandra Glenn, Aki A Tanimoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Russell C HardieUniversity of Dayton, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Dayton, Ohio, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1216-3865
Dylan FlauteUniversity of Dayton, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Dayton, Ohio, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5601-459X
Barath N NarayananUniversity of Dayton, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Dayton, Ohio, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9648-5695
Andrew T TroutCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States.
Jonathan R DillmanCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0124-0164
Pradipta DebnathCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2590-7891
Alexandra GlennCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States.
Aki A TanimotoCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States.

Funding

Pediatric-specific computer aided detection of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography scansR03EB036572 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON · PI Russell Hardie · 2025 to 2026
$150k
NIBIB NIH HHS R03 EB036572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: In pediatric patients with cancer, the presence of small lung nodules and micronodules on computed tomography (CT) scans can be clinically significant and indicative of metastatic cancer. Lung nodule computer-aided detection (CAD) systems trained with larger adult nodules have been shown to be less sensitive to smaller nodules in pediatric patients. To our knowledge, no pediatric-trained lung nodule CAD systems have been evaluated in the literature. To help address this gap, we compare the performance of two CAD systems, both trained on adult data and separately with pediatric data. Approach: We developed a lung nodule CAD system, Deep FlyerScan, and compared it with the Medical Open Network for Artificial Intelligence (MONAI) lung nodule detection system. Both systems are initially trained using adult data and then each is fine-tuned with pediatric data. Performance is evaluated using a retrospective pediatric dataset comprising 75 CT scans. Reference standard nodules have been provided by multiradiologist review from an earlier study. Results: The pediatric fine-tuned Deep FlyerScan and MONAI systems detected 74.8% (404/540) and 64.6% (349/540) of pediatric nodules at 5 false positives per scan, respectively. This compares with 62.0% (335/540) and 55.0% (297/540), respectively, for their counterparts trained using only adult data. Conclusions: The two CAD systems studied showed increased sensitivity in detecting lung nodules in pediatric CT scans when fine-tuned using pediatric data compared with training using only adult data. The improvement may be related to reference standard nodule size differences between the adult and pediatric datasets.

Indexed as

computer-aided detectionDeep FlyerScanlung nodulesMONAIpediatric

Identifiers

PMID42131288
PMCPMC13167107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.