ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2026
Pediatric-specific computer-aided detection of lung nodules in computed tomography scans.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: In pediatric patients with cancer, the presence of small lung nodules and micronodules on computed tomography (CT) scans can be clinically significant and indicative of metastatic cancer. Lung nodule computer-aided detection (CAD) systems trained with larger adult nodules have been shown to be less sensitive to smaller nodules in pediatric patients. To our knowledge, no pediatric-trained lung nodule CAD systems have been evaluated in the literature. To help address this gap, we compare the performance of two CAD systems, both trained on adult data and separately with pediatric data. Approach: We developed a lung nodule CAD system, Deep FlyerScan, and compared it with the Medical Open Network for Artificial Intelligence (MONAI) lung nodule detection system. Both systems are initially trained using adult data and then each is fine-tuned with pediatric data. Performance is evaluated using a retrospective pediatric dataset comprising 75 CT scans. Reference standard nodules have been provided by multiradiologist review from an earlier study. Results: The pediatric fine-tuned Deep FlyerScan and MONAI systems detected 74.8% (404/540) and 64.6% (349/540) of pediatric nodules at 5 false positives per scan, respectively. This compares with 62.0% (335/540) and 55.0% (297/540), respectively, for their counterparts trained using only adult data. Conclusions: The two CAD systems studied showed increased sensitivity in detecting lung nodules in pediatric CT scans when fine-tuned using pediatric data compared with training using only adult data. The improvement may be related to reference standard nodule size differences between the adult and pediatric datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.