Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42131281›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in ophthalmology2026

A 5-year retrospective review of post-Mohs reconstruction outcomes for periocular cutaneous malignancies at an academic medical center.

Amanda K Hertel, Aaron Veenis, Rachel Chu, Nathaniel Cameron, Nikki Gill, Irfan Ansari, Maggie Malmberg, Emilee Wells, Geethanjalee Mudunkotuwa, Isuru Ratnayake and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Amanda K HertelDepartment of Ophthalmology, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Aaron VeenisDepartment of Ophthalmology, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Rachel ChuDepartment of Ophthalmology, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Nathaniel CameronDepartment of Ophthalmology, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Nikki GillDepartment of Ophthalmology, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Irfan AnsariDepartment of Ophthalmology, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Maggie MalmbergDepartment of Ophthalmology, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Emilee WellsDepartment of Ophthalmology, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Geethanjalee MudunkotuwaDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Isuru RatnayakeDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Jason A SokolDepartment of Ophthalmology, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This project examines outcomes of post-Mohs reconstruction for periocular cutaneous malignancies. These results highlight reconstructive surgery challenges and their solutions, a topic with limited peer-reviewed literature. Methods: A retrospective chart review on post-Mohs reconstruction outcomes for adults seen at a tertiary referral center between August 2018 and March 2023 was performed. Information on demographics, past medical history, and surgical outcomes was collected. Descriptive statistics and correlations where applied were applicable. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved this study. Results: A total of 194 patients met the inclusion criteria (mean age, 67.7 years). Past medical history and skin cancer risk factors were evaluated. The most common periocular malignancy was basal cell carcinoma (70.6%), the location was lower lid (56.7%), and the reconstruction type was Modified Hughes tarsoconjunctival flap (24.7%). There were no intraoperative complications. The most common post-operative complications were healing issues (6.7%) or ectropion (6.2%). Patients reported post-operative symptoms such as eye irritation (23.2%) or pain (20.1%). Most patients had full eyelid function after surgery (93.3%) and acceptable cosmetic appearance (94.8%). Some correlations were found. For example, post-Mohs defect size was associated with variables such as cure rate (p = 0.01834) and general eyelid reconstruction (p = 0.0230). Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with decreased cure rates (p = 0.0010) and recurrence (p = 0.0174). Conclusions: This study found associations between health history, periocular cutaneous malignancy features, and post-Mohs reconstruction outcomes. Features such as location, defect size, and staged reconstruction techniques in particular had an association with numerous outcomes.

Indexed as

Mohs surgeryoculoplasticsperiocular malignanciespost-Mohs reconstructionskin cancer

Identifiers

PMID42131281
PMCPMC13160680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.