Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42131262›Full record

ReviewNagoya journal of medical science2026

Knacks and pitfalls of retroperitoneal sarcoma surgery, part 2: practical tumor resection in Nagoya University.

Yukihiro Yokoyama, Masaki Sunagawa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nagoya journal of medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yukihiro YokoyamaDivision of Perioperative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Masaki SunagawaDivision of Perioperative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article provides a detailed account of the practical techniques and precautions regarding the surgical resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). As there is no standardized procedure for RPS surgery, the operative approach must be flexible, depending on tumor location and extent. Stepwise dissection from multiple directions is emphasized, as well as decision-making regarding combined resection of adjacent organs, such as the intestine, pancreas, kidney, liver, and adrenal gland. Strategies for managing tumor-associated feeding arteries and drainage veins to minimize intraoperative bleeding are also discussed. Nephrectomy is recommended when the tumor invades the renal hilum or adjacent structures; however, kidney preservation is considered whenever possible. The paper also addresses the extent of resection required, noting that in retroperitoneal liposarcoma, compartmental fat tissue removal is often preferred over strict margin-based resection, considering the high rate of microscopic infiltration. Distinguishing well-differentiated from dedifferentiated components is partially achievable using imaging and intraoperative findings. Given the complexity of these procedures, multidisciplinary collaboration and the anesthesiologist's understanding of the surgical strategy are essential. This comprehensive overview highlights the technical depth and adaptability required for large RPS resections.

Indexed as

Retroperitoneal NeoplasmsSarcomaHumansLiposarcomaNephrectomyextent of resectionnephrectomypractical tumor resection

Identifiers

PMID42131262
PMCPMC13167239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.