ArticleCureus2026
Public Cognizance Concerning Skin Cancer in the Qassim Region of Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Skin cancer is a growing public health concern in Saudi Arabia, with ultraviolet (UV) radiation recognized as the primary modifiable risk factor. Public awareness and preventive behaviours are essential for early detection. This study assessed knowledge, attitudes, and risk‑related characteristics concerning skin cancer among adults in the Qassim region. Methods A descriptive cross‑sectional study was conducted among adults (≥18 years) residing in Qassim. Data were collected over three months using a validated, self‑administered online questionnaire distributed via social media platforms. The survey assessed demographics, phenotypic risk factors, knowledge, and attitudes. Data were analysed using SPSS version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY), employing descriptive statistics and chi‑square tests to examine associations between sociodemographic variables and knowledge categories. Results A total of 3,420 participants were included; 60.5% were female participants and 94.4% were younger than 50 years. Most respondents (58.5%) exhibited darker phenotypic traits, and 69.8% reported having fewer than five moles. Overall, 74.9% demonstrated good knowledge of skin cancer, and 94.1% expressed positive attitudes towards prevention. Educational level showed a statistically significant association with knowledge status (χ² = 34.723, p < 0.001), indicating higher knowledge among participants with university or postgraduate education. Age was also significantly associated with awareness (p < 0.001). Conclusion Participants demonstrated generally good knowledge and positive attitudes towards skin cancer prevention despite belonging to a predominantly lower‑risk demographic. However, substantial gaps persisted regarding hereditary risk, mucosal involvement, and recognition of chronic non‑healing wounds. Targeted educational interventions, particularly for individuals with lower educational attainment, are recommended to strengthen early detection practices and promote comprehensive sun‑protective behaviours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.