Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42131228›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026

Development of an intelligent food nutrition recognition and nutrient intake assessment system in hospital settings.

Boshi Wang, Chenyu Nong, Jiayu Zhang, Jing Lv, Shilong Zhao, Longxiang Li, Peng Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Boshi Wang *Department of Clinical Nutrition, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chenyu Nong *Department of Clinical Nutrition, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jiayu ZhangDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jing LvDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Shilong ZhaoDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Longxiang LiDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, China.
Peng LiuDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hospital nutritional diets significantly impact healthcare service standards, therapeutic outcomes, and patient satisfaction. Traditional manual dietary survey methods suffer from substantial limitations and high resource demands. Despite technological advances, few systems have successfully integrated machine vision, electronic weighing, and standardized databases for real-time nutrient assessment in clinical settings. Objective: To develop and validate an intelligent food nutrition recognition and nutrient intake assessment system for hospital therapeutic diets, enabling precise, large-scale monitoring of patient nutrient intake. Methods: We developed an AI-based image recognition system integrating RGB-D imaging, the Segment Anything Model (SAM) for food image segmentation, and the SE_ResNet50_vd model for food classification. The system comprised hardware components (food weight collector, image collector, computing host) and software modules (nutritional analysis platform developed in Java/Spring Boot). A comprehensive database was constructed from 204 standardized therapeutic diet varieties from Peking University People's Hospital, incorporating the Chinese Food Composition Table and cooking loss factors. Post-meal intake was calculated by comparing pre- and post-meal food volumes using depth camera imaging and density-based weight estimation. Food type recognition accuracy was tested on 1,000 samples, and volume estimation accuracy was validated against gravimetric measurements across 100 food items. Results: The food image recognition model achieved 99.2% accuracy on the test set. Volume estimation accuracy exceeded 90% in 39% of cases and 80-90% in 61% of cases, with a minimum threshold of 80% across all tested items. The SAM model demonstrated robust segmentation performance for diverse food types in standardized meal containers. The integrated system successfully monitored over 20 types of therapeutic diets, matching nutrient compositions to personalized requirements with ≥90% accuracy for meal verification. Conclusions: This intelligent system provides standardized, real-time nutrient intake assessment with superior accuracy compared to traditional dietary survey methods. By automating therapeutic meal supervision and enabling precision nutrition monitoring, it represents a significant advancement from empirical to precision-based clinical nutrition practice, with substantial potential for improving treatment accuracy, patient outcomes, and healthcare resource optimization in hospital settings.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclinical nutritiondietary surveynutrient intakesegment anything model

Identifiers

PMID42131228
PMCPMC13160742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.