ArticleACS ES&T air2026
Airborne Particulate Matter Sensing via Laser Filament-Interaction and Deep Learning.
Article in ACS ES&T air, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Airborne particulate matter, including mineral dust and biological aerosols, such as pollen, presents growing challenges to public health, agriculture, and environmental monitoring. Current technologies lack the capability to identify single particles remotely in real-time. Here, we demonstrate the feasibility of femtosecond laser filamentation combined with optical imaging and lightweight deep learning for the remote identification of airborne particulates. Chalk dust, pollen grains, and salt crystals were delivered into a laser-generated filament, where their optical emission events were captured and analyzed. A convolutional neural network trained on these events achieved high classification accuracy across all categories, with a mean accuracy of 87.5%. Grad-CAM visualizations confirmed that the network focused on discriminative spatial and spectral features for chalk, salt, and pollen. This study demonstrates the feasibility of remote, species-level airborne particulate detection and lays the foundation for intelligent, real-time atmospheric sensing platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.