Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42131188›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Safety and preliminary efficacy of Aurora: a pilot, non-randomized clinical trial of a culturally adapted digital cognitive behavioral therapy intervention for anxiety and depression in Mexico.

Edith Zárate, Augusto César Velasco-Téllez, Lucia Araceli Sanchez-Reyes, Ángel Mario Coll-Muñoz, Miguel Ángel Ramírez-Ramírez, Alejandro López-Tello, Christian Gabriel Toledo-Lozano, Ana Moreno-Coutiño, María Del Pilar Callejas-Gómez, Raúl Durón-Figueroa and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Edith ZáratePsicofarma S.A. de C.V., Mexico City, Mexico.
Augusto César Velasco-TéllezFundación FelizMente, Mexico City, Mexico.
Lucia Araceli Sanchez-ReyesFundación FelizMente, Mexico City, Mexico.
Ángel Mario Coll-MuñozServicios Especializados en Ensayos Clínicos, Mexico City, Mexico.
Miguel Ángel Ramírez-RamírezServicios Especializados en Ensayos Clínicos, Mexico City, Mexico.
Alejandro López-TelloDepartamento de Psicología, Universidad Iberoamericana, Mexico City, Mexico.
Christian Gabriel Toledo-LozanoCoordinación de Investigación, Centro Médico Nacional "20 de Noviembre", ISSSTE, Mexico City, Mexico.
Ana Moreno-CoutiñoLaboratorio de Atención Plena Compasiva, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
María Del Pilar Callejas-GómezPrivate Practitioner, Mexico City, Mexico.
Raúl Durón-FigueroaLaboratorio de Enseñanza Virtual y Ciberpsicología, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Lorena Alejandra Flores-PlataFacultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala, Universidad Nacional de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Antonio Ramirez-TreviñoCINVESTAV Unidad Guadalajara, Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico.
Sebastian Nava-LópezPsicofarma S.A. de C.V., Mexico City, Mexico.
Diego Antonio Ocampo-Gutiérrez de VelascoPsicofarma S.A. de C.V., Mexico City, Mexico.
Oscar Arias-CarriónDivisión de Neurociencias Clínica, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/objective: Anxiety and depressive disorders are leading causes of disability worldwide, and access to evidence-based psychological treatment remains limited in many middle-income countries. Digital cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) interventions have emerged as scalable tools to address this treatment gap, yet few have undergone clinical evaluation in Latin American populations. This study aimed to assess the safety and preliminary efficacy of Aurora, a Spanish-language, culturally adapted digital CBT program, when used as an adjunct to pharmacotherapy in adults with generalized anxiety disorder. Methods: In a multicenter, open-label, non-randomized pilot study, 34 adults diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder receiving stable pharmacological treatment were assigned through pragmatic, convenience-based allocation either to an experimental group (Aurora plus medication; n = 24) or to a control group receiving medication alone (n = 10). The sample had a mean age of 39.85 ± 12.88 years, with a predominance of women (22/34). Participants were followed for 12 weeks with assessments at baseline and weeks 4, 8, and 12. Clinical outcomes included anxiety severity measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), pathological worry assessed by the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), and depressive symptoms evaluated using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Safety was monitored through structured adverse-event reporting. Statistical analyses included linear mixed-effects models for longitudinal outcomes, ordinal logistic regression for severity transitions, and negative binomial regression and Fisher's exact test for adverse events, with false discovery rate correction applied where appropriate. Results: Aurora demonstrated a favorable safety profile, with no serious adverse events and comparable adverse-event incidence between groups under structured clinical monitoring at weeks 4, 8, and 12. Anxiety symptoms (GAD-7) showed a significant effect of time (F Conclusion: This pilot study provides preliminary, hypothesis-generating evidence that a culturally adapted digital CBT intervention can be safely integrated with pharmacotherapy and may be associated with enhanced improvements in anxiety-related outcomes, particularly pathological worry, in a Mexican clinical population. However, the non-randomized design, small sample size, and baseline imbalances limit causal inference and generalizability, and findings should be interpreted with caution. Larger randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm efficacy, determine long-term clinical impact, and guide the implementation of digital therapeutics in Latin American mental health systems.

Indexed as

anxiety disordersdigital cognitive behavioral therapydigital therapeuticsgeneralized anxiety disordermobile health intervention

Identifiers

PMID42131188
PMCPMC13161079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.