ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
A prospective cohort study on the incidence and influencing factors of subsyndromal delirium in ICU patients.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aims to develop and validate a machine learning-based risk prediction model for subsyndromal delirium (SSD) in ICU patients, while identifying key risk factors. Method: This study was a prospective study, selecting patients who were hospitalized in the ICU from October 2024 to May 2025. We compared seven machine learning algorithms: Random Forest (RF), Decision Tree (DT), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Logistic Regression (LR), Elastic Network (EN), Extreme Gradient Enhancement (XGB), and Support Vector Machine (SVM). Result: In our study, the prevalence rate of SSD was 37.158%. The comparative analysis shows that XGB is the best predictive model (AUC = 0.84). Feature importance analysis identified four significant predictive factors: Use of vasoactive drugs (0.412), Monthly household income (0.306), Undergone surgery (0.191) and Number of Medications (0.036). Conclusion: The prediction model based on XGB has a good effect in identifying the risk of SSD in ICU patients. These findings enable clinicians to stratify high-risk groups and implement timely and targeted intervention measures, effectively reducing the risk of adverse consequences. Future multicenter studies should validate these results in larger cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.