Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42131137›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2026

A novel multiplexed biomarker panel reveals key molecular pathways in progressive multiple sclerosis.

Christina N Heiss, Lenka Novakova, Markus Axelsson, Kübra Tan, Ilaria Pola, Wiebke Traichel, Ida Pesämaa, Magnus Johnsson, Sofia Sandgren, Clas Malmeström and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Christina N HeissDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg 41345, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7087-2259
Lenka NovakovaDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg 41345, Sweden.
Markus AxelssonDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg 41345, Sweden.
Kübra TanDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg 41345, Sweden.
Ilaria PolaDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg 41345, Sweden.
Wiebke TraichelDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg 41345, Sweden.
Ida PesämaaDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg 41345, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3902-3137
Magnus JohnssonDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg 41345, Sweden.
Sofia SandgrenDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg 41345, Sweden.
Clas MalmeströmDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg 41345, Sweden.
Andrea L BenedetDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg 41345, Sweden.
Henrik ZetterbergDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg 41345, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3930-4354
Jan N LyckeDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg 41345, Sweden.
Stefanie FruhwürthDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg 41345, Sweden.
Igal RosensteinDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg 41345, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Progressive multiple sclerosis is characterized by gradual neurological decline, often occurring independently of relapses or MRI activity-a phenomenon known as progression independent of relapse and MRI activity (PIRMA). Despite the effectiveness of disease-modifying therapies in controlling inflammatory activity, identifying individuals at risk of PIRMA remains an unmet clinical need. The objective of this exploratory study was to identify biomarkers and underlying molecular pathways associated with multiple sclerosis progression and especially PIRMA. Using the NUcleic acid Linked Immuno-Sandwich Assay (NULISA) inflammatory panel, we quantified 250 immune-related proteins in CSF and plasma from 49 controls, 49 patients with early active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and 33 patients with inactive progressive multiple sclerosis (iPMS). Longitudinal clinical data were used to define PIRMA and conversion to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). We identified distinct proteomic signatures in CSF of both RRMS and iPMS patients compared with controls, with no significant differences in plasma. Both were associated with elevated markers of adaptive immunity, while iPMS showed a shift towards innate immune markers. Among RRMS patients, low baseline CSF concentrations of KIT ligand (KITLG) predicted both conversion to SPMS and future PIRMA events. Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated KITLG's potential as a prognostic biomarker. Additionally, plasma concentrations of interleukin 1 beta and 36 gamma were elevated in RRMS patients who later developed SPMS. A model selection analysis identified a two-protein logistic regression model including interleukin 1 beta and interleukin 36 gamma as the best-performing combination (area under the curve = 0.990). Our findings reveal distinct immunological profiles across multiple sclerosis subtypes and identify KITLG as a promising biomarker for predicting disease progression and PIRMA. These results highlight potential targets for therapeutic intervention and demonstrate the utility of NULISA in uncovering novel molecular signatures in multiple sclerosis.

Indexed as

biomarkersc-kit signallingmultiplex immunoassayneuroinflammationstem cell factor

Identifiers

PMID42131137
PMCPMC13160671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.