ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Development and validation of interpretable machine learning models for predicting stroke in NVAF patients with CHA
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with CHA₂DS₂-VA ≤1 face uncertainty in stroke risk assessment, particularly in Asian populations. Machine-learning (ML) models offer improved accuracy for individualized risk prediction. Methods: This single-center, retrospective study at Zhongshan Hospital, Xiamen University (January 2022-January 2025) included 82 NVAF-related stroke cases and 164 matched non-stroke controls with CHA₂DS₂-VA ≤1. Data encompassed demographics, comorbidities, laboratory markers, and echocardiographic parameters. Following stratified train-test split (80%:20%), feature selection used univariable logistic regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, retaining the intersection of variables selected by both methods. Three nested predictor sets were defined: Model A (clinical and routine laboratory variables), Model B (Model A plus Cardiac biomarkers), and Model C (Model B plus echocardiographic parameters). ML algorithms [logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), XGBoost (XGB)] underwent nested cross-validation for hyperparameter tuning. Performance was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1 score. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) were applied to the best-performing ML algorithm in the test set to evaluate the contributions of individual features. Results: Stroke cases were older, with higher E/e' ratio, and elevated N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), C-reactive protein (CRP), and white blood cell count (all Conclusions: ML models incorporating cardiac biomarkers and echocardiographic parameters improve stroke risk stratification in low- to moderate-risk NVAF patients, supporting personalized anticoagulation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.