ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2026
Intraoperative Traction for Cephalomedullary Nailing in Amputation Patients.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Femoral fracture fixation in lower-limb amputees is challenging due to limited limb purchase, altered biomechanics, and sparse guidance. We describe an intraoperative skeletal-traction technique to facilitate cephalomedullary nailing (CMN). Case Report: Two amputee patients with extracapsular proximal femur fractures underwent CMN. Under biplanar fluoroscopy, a 5-mm distal femoral traction pin was placed through the residual limb and secured to the traction boot to restore length, correct alignment, and permit controlled reduction. Results: Patient 1 (65-year-old female; prior left below-knee amputation, contralateral above-knee amputation) achieved an acceptable reduction and implant position; she died on post-operative day 3 from cardiopulmonary arrest. Patient 2 (77-year-old male; prior right above-knee amputation) achieved anatomic reduction with the nail tip proximal to the traction pin; the pin was removed at the case end. At 13 months, his outcome remained satisfactory; he later required contralateral amputation for ischemia. Conclusion: Intraoperative skeletal traction through a distal femoral pin offers reliable control of length and rotation during CMN in amputees and may provide superior stump control to skin traction. Careful pin placement is essential to mitigate neurovascular risk. This approach appears feasible for both above- and below-knee amputees; larger series are needed to define indications and long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.