Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42131001›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2026

Assessment of Teriparatide's Effect on Post-operative Functional Outcome and Fracture Healing.

Nanthivarman Selvakumar, Leo Jose, Hari Sivanandan, Sheel Sunil Chhajed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nanthivarman SelvakumarDepartment of Orthopaedics, Vinayaka Mission Kirupananda Variyar Medical College and Hospital, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.
Leo JoseDepartment of Orthopaedics, Vinayaka Mission Kirupananda Variyar Medical College and Hospital, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.
Hari SivanandanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Vinayaka Mission Kirupananda Variyar Medical College and Hospital, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sheel Sunil ChhajedDepartment of Orthopaedics, Vinayaka Mission Kirupananda Variyar Medical College and Hospital, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Osteoporotic fractures represent a substantial clinical burden with compromised healing trajectories and elevated non-union risk. Teriparatide, a recombinant parathyroid hormone analog, demonstrates anabolic bone formation capacity through enhanced osteoblastic activity. However, optimal patient selection and treatment protocols remain inadequately defined. This retrospective comparative study investigated adjuvant teriparatide efficacy in enhancing post-operative fracture healing outcomes among patients undergoing open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for osteoporotic fractures, with particular emphasis on identifying patient subpopulations demonstrating maximal therapeutic benefit. Materials and Methods: This study enrolled 120 patients aged 40-75 years with osteoporotic fractures requiring surgical fixation at a tertiary care teaching hospital from August 2020 through August 2024. Participants received either standard therapy (oral calcium and Vitamin D3) or adjuvant teriparatide therapy. Primary outcomes encompassed radiographic union rates, non-union and delayed union incidence, and complication profiles assessed at 3-month intervals throughout 9-month post-operative surveillance. Radiographic healing was independently evaluated by two fellowship-trained orthopedic radiologists employing validated criteria. Results: Baseline characteristics demonstrated statistical equivalence. All patients underwent ORIF using standard AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association principles, with surgical approach and fixation method. Teriparatide therapy yielded statistically significant non-union reduction with 8 participants (13.33%) in standard therapy versus 1 participant (1.67%) in the teriparatide group, P = 0.0160, relative risk (RR) 0.125 with 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.016-0.973, representing 87.5% RR reduction. Delayed union was eliminated in teriparatide recipients with 8 participants (13.33%) versus 0 participants (0%), P = 0.0030. Pre-specified subgroup analysis revealed pronounced treatment effect modification in osteoporotic participants with treatment-by-osteoporosis interaction P < 0.0001, wherein 14 of 17 participants (82.35%) achieved late-phase healing between 6 and 9 months, yielding a number needed to treat of 1.2 patients with 95% CI 1.0-1.6. Safety profile remained acceptable with zero serious adverse events and 57 participants (95%) maintaining treatment adherence. Conclusion: Adjuvant teriparatide therapy demonstrates substantial efficacy preventing non-union and eliminating delayed union in osteoporotic fracture patients undergoing surgical fixation. However, paradoxical temporal healing patterns suggest teriparatide functions optimally as a targeted salvage intervention in delayed-healing fractures rather than a universal accelerator, emphasizing patient selection criticality for optimizing therapeutic yield.

Indexed as

bone densityfracture fixationfracture healinginternalosteoporotic fracturesparathyroid hormoneTeriparatidetreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID42131001
PMCPMC13161968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.