ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2026
Quantitative Scratch Collapse Test Methodology With Handheld Dynamometer: Normative Upper-Extremity Force Data and Reliability Analysis.
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Commentary: Quantitative Scratch Collapse Test Methodology with Handheld Dynamometer: Normative Upper-Extremity Force Data and Reliability Analysis.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The scratch collapse test (SCT) has variable sensitivity and specificity due to inconsistent protocols and subjective interpretation. This study aimed to establish normative upper-extremity force and torque values in healthy adults and to assess the inter- and intra-examiner reliability of a standardized quantitative SCT approach. Methods: Healthy adult participants performed maximal isometric shoulder external-rotation resistance, whereas two independent examiners (A.M.F. and M.D.) each conducted repeated trials per arm. Force and torque values were recorded using a handheld dynamometry device. Reliability was assessed across examiners and within examiners to evaluate consistency of measurements. Results: Normative force and torque values were obtained for both upper extremities. Interrater reliability was determined to be good to excellent, and intrarater reliability was excellent. No meaningful systematic differences were identified between examiners. Conclusions: The quantitative SCT protocol using handheld dynamometry provides reproducible normative values, and initial results demonstrate high reliability in healthy adults. By reducing examiner variability, this standardized approach strengthens the foundation for future validation studies in patient populations and may support more objective clinical application of the SCT in peripheral nerve compression syndromes. Type of study/level of evidence: Diagnostic II.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.