Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42130879›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Digital health literacy framework for PE teachers: a grounded theory study.

Yu Yang, Weijin Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yu YangSchool of Physical Education, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Weijin ShiSchool of Physical Education, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: As digital technologies transform health information environments, digital health literacy has become a core professional competence for school-based health education. Physical education (PE) teachers serve as the primary facilitators of school health promotion; however, unlike general educators, they are uniquely responsible for bridging physical activity with complex digital health data, making their specific competency requirements critical yet undertheorised. Methodology: This qualitative study used a grounded theory approach to conduct semistructured interviews with 34 participants (primary/secondary school PE teachers and higher education experts) from 12 provinces in China. Interview data were analyzed with NVivo 15.0 through open, axial and selective coding, which was supplemented by relevant literature and policy documents. Results: The analysis generated a Digital Health Literacy Framework for PE Teachers. It comprises three core dimensions: Digital Health Awareness and Critical Literacy, Digital Teaching Practice and Innovative Application Competence and Digital Security Ethics and Environmental Awareness Competence. Distinct from general digital literacy models, this framework specifically integrates pedagogical content knowledge with health-related information appraisal, capturing the intersection of technology, health promotion, and physical education pedagogy. Conclusion: The proposed framework conceptualizes PE teachers' digital health literacy as a systematic competency system. It provides an evidence-based foundation for developing national standards, training modules, and digitalization policies.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyPhysical Education and TrainingSchool TeachersAdultChinaDigital HealthFemaleGrounded TheoryHumansInterviews as TopicQualitative Researchdata ethics in educationdigital health literacydigital teaching competencegrounded theoryphysicaleducation teachers

Identifiers

PMID42130879
PMCPMC13161172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.