Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42130826›Full record

ArticleStatistics and computing2025

Subgroup Analysis of Differential Networks with Latent Variables.

Linxi Li, Shuangge Ma, Qingzhao Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics and computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Linxi LiDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, Xiamen University, 422 Siming South Road, 361005 Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Shuangge MaDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, 60 College Street, 06510 New Haven, CT, United States.
Qingzhao ZhangDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, Xiamen University, 422 Siming South Road, 361005 Xiamen, Fujian, China.

Funding

Novel methods for identifying genetic interactions in cancer prognosisR01CA204120 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Shuangge Ma · 2016 to 2026
$3.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differential network analysis serves as a crucial tool in capturing variations in network rewiring patterns across different biological conditions. Real-world observational data often contain subgroup structures with differing statistical properties, potentially leading to heterogeneity among differential networks. However, existing graphical model-based heterogeneity analysis methods are designed for subgroup networks rather than differential networks. Moreover, these methods require sparsity within each network, which is ineffective for dense networks, especially when observed variables are confounded by latent (unobserved) variables. In this article, we focus on estimating differential networks between an unlabeled heterogeneous group and a baseline group, and develop subgroup analysis from the perspective of differential networks. By imposing a sparse plus low-rank structure on the baseline network and sparsity on differential networks, which characterize and balance the influence of latent variables, the proposed method allows for effective estimation of sparse differential networks and non-sparse subgroup networks. We develop an efficient computational algorithm for this purpose. Simulation studies demonstrate the competitive performance of the proposed approach over closely related alternatives. An application to a set of data on Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) further confirms the utility of the methodology.

Indexed as

Differential network analysisLatent variablesNon-sparse networkUnsupervised heterogeneity analysis

Identifiers

PMID42130826
PMCPMC13166169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.