ArticleClinical case reports2026
Recurrent Rhinophyma: A Case of Triple Relapse and Therapeutic Challenges.
Article in Clinical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rhinophyma recurrence after surgical excision poses a significant therapeutic challenge, often stemming from the incomplete removal of deep hyperplastic pilosebaceous units. We present the case of a 66-year-old male with a third occurrence of rhinophyma after two prior failed cold-steel excisions. The definitive intervention consisted of a modified deep tangential excision, removing all rhinophymatous tissue to a deep dermal plane that approached, but did not violate, the nasal perichondrium, thereby eradicating the pathologic glandular nidus while preserving the deepest adnexal remnants essential for re-epithelialization. The wound was primarily managed by secondary intention healing, guided by selective, tension-free suture re-approximation of key wound edges to optimize contour. Cold-steel excision was specifically chosen to ensure a specimen free of thermal artifact for definitive histopathology, a critical step in a recurrent case, which ultimately confirmed marked sebaceous gland hypertrophy and excluded malignancy. The postoperative course was uneventful, and at an 18-month follow-up, the patient demonstrated a stable, successfully restored nasal contour with no signs of recurrence. This case demonstrates that for severe, recurrent rhinophyma, a surgical strategy that balances thorough debulking of pathologic tissue with meticulous preservation of deep adnexal structures is critical for achieving a durable, long-term outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.