Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42130690›Full record

ArticleACS energy letters2026

Photoelectrode Durability in Two- versus Three-Electrode Configurations: Understanding the Impact of Circuit Configuration on Water-Splitting Stability.

Mitchell J Hansen, James L Young, Myles A Steiner, Ryan O'Hayre, Todd G Deutsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS energy letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mitchell J HansenAdvanced Energy Systems Graduate Program, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7653-9251
James L YoungNational Laboratory of the Rockies, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7291-0079
Myles A SteinerNational Laboratory of the Rockies, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States.
Ryan O'HayreDepartment of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3762-3052
Todd G DeutschNational Laboratory of the Rockies, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6577-1226

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Device durability remains a significant challenge in photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting under ambient conditions. Yet, a lack of understanding of the test configuration and applied bias effects continue to hinder progress. In this study, we differentiate two-electrode (2E) and three-electrode (3E) configurations for evaluating PEC material durability, focusing particularly on their impacts on photoabsorber solid-state operating conditions. Our results underscore the fallacy of inferring 2E device stability from durability measurements performed solely in 3E configurations. Unmeasured and often misunderstood total circuit bias in 3E tests moderates material degradation, leading to the overestimation of photoelectrode stability compared to short-circuit operation. We demonstrate how the photoabsorber's operating voltage critically governs charge separation, surface stability, and degradation mechanisms during PEC operation. With these findings, we propose a standardized framework for conducting more reliable 3E durability experiments that simulate unassisted performance to help accelerate the development of robust, stable materials for solar-driven water splitting.

Identifiers

PMID42130690
PMCPMC13162313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.