Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42130669›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroanatomy2026

Pulvinar subdivisions and connectivity patterns across primate species: a comparative perspective.

Juliana G M Soares, Amaro R A Correia, Ricardo Gattass, Bruss Lima

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroanatomy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Juliana G M SoaresLaboratory of Cognitive Physiology, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Amaro R A CorreiaLaboratory of Cognitive Physiology, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Ricardo GattassLaboratory of Cognitive Physiology, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Bruss LimaLaboratory of Cognitive Physiology, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the advances in our ability to perturb brain activity in recent years, new stimulation techniques have become essential tools in human neuroscience. Non-invasive stimulation methods, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), as well as deep brain stimulation (DBS) delivered invasively to access deep brain structures, have been applied in both basic and clinical research and in the treatment of neurological conditions including Parkinson's disease, essential tremor and epilepsy. In the context of epilepsy, neuromodulatory interventions have demonstrated encouraging results in reducing seizure frequency, bringing attention to the thalamic pulvinar nucleus as a potential target for stimulation in drug-resistant cases. To advance these and future therapies, it is necessary to have a more detailed understanding of the subdivisions and connectivity patterns of these nuclei. Although some human studies have employed diffusion imaging and fMRI, much of the current knowledge of pulvinar connectivity still comes from non-human primate (NHP) studies. The aim of this study is to review the cortico-pulvinar connectivity patterns of distinct pulvinar subregions across NHP species, alongside available human studies, to help optimize future basic and clinical research.

Indexed as

capuchin monkeyconnectivitycortical areasnew world monkeysprimatepulvinarsuperior colliculusthalamus

Identifiers

PMID42130669
PMCPMC13161146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.