ReviewFrontiers in neuroanatomy2026
Pulvinar subdivisions and connectivity patterns across primate species: a comparative perspective.
Review in Frontiers in neuroanatomy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the advances in our ability to perturb brain activity in recent years, new stimulation techniques have become essential tools in human neuroscience. Non-invasive stimulation methods, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), as well as deep brain stimulation (DBS) delivered invasively to access deep brain structures, have been applied in both basic and clinical research and in the treatment of neurological conditions including Parkinson's disease, essential tremor and epilepsy. In the context of epilepsy, neuromodulatory interventions have demonstrated encouraging results in reducing seizure frequency, bringing attention to the thalamic pulvinar nucleus as a potential target for stimulation in drug-resistant cases. To advance these and future therapies, it is necessary to have a more detailed understanding of the subdivisions and connectivity patterns of these nuclei. Although some human studies have employed diffusion imaging and fMRI, much of the current knowledge of pulvinar connectivity still comes from non-human primate (NHP) studies. The aim of this study is to review the cortico-pulvinar connectivity patterns of distinct pulvinar subregions across NHP species, alongside available human studies, to help optimize future basic and clinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.