Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42130598›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026

A case report of an incidentally diagnosed primary isolated splenic hydatid cyst: the therapeutic dilemma of surgery versus watchful waiting.

Rahul Jha, Sabin Kumar Ghimire, Rishika Prasad, Rabin Kumar Ghimire, Aman Shrestha, Mukesh Jaiswar

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rahul JhaDepartment of General Surgery, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9606-0317
Sabin Kumar GhimireDepartment of General Surgery, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4962-279X
Rishika PrasadDepartment of General Surgery, Nepal Medical College Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1477-8958
Rabin Kumar GhimireDepartment of Radiodiagnosis and Interventional Radiology, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7221-4064
Aman ShresthaDepartment of General Surgery, Karnali Academy of Health Sciences, Jumla, Nepal.
Mukesh JaiswarDepartment of General Surgery, Karnali Academy of Health Sciences, Jumla, Nepal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction and importance: The incidence of splenic hydatid cyst is 1%, and it comprises 0.5-4% of abdominal hydatid cysts. Primary hydatid cyst of the spleen is rare even in endemic areas, comprising only 2% of all splenic hydatid cysts. This case is unique due to the incidental finding of a rare isolated splenic hydatid cyst without other organ involvement. It raises surgeon awareness of atypical presentations, aiding diagnosis and guiding timely intervention versus watchful waiting. Case presentation: A 36-year-old female was incidentally diagnosed with a splenic hydatid cyst during radiological evaluation as part of a routine health check-up. Clinical examination revealed no significant findings, and baseline blood investigations were within normal limits. She underwent splenectomy successfully and was discharged on the fourth postoperative day with advice to continue albendazole for 1 more month. Clinical discussion: The membrane of a splenic hydatid cyst is typically thin, delicate, and fragile, in contrast to the hepatic hydatid cyst, which has a thicker and more robust wall. The risk of spontaneous or traumatic rupture is higher in splenic hydatid cysts compared to hepatic hydatid cysts. Thus, splenectomy is a safe and widely accepted option for splenic hydatid cysts. Conclusion: Watchful waiting is generally not recommended for Type I and Type III splenic hydatid cysts, even in asymptomatic or incidentally detected cases, whereas it may be considered in selected cases of hepatic hydatid cysts. In addition, watchful waiting can be considered in Type IV and Type V splenic hydatid cysts, as these represent inactive stages.

Indexed as

case reportincidentalpericystectomysplenectomysplenic hydatid cystwatchful waiting

Identifiers

PMID42130598
PMCPMC13166749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.