ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026
Abscess formation following secondary migration of peripherally inserted central catheter in a neonate: a case report and review of literature.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are widely used for long-term intravenous access in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Although generally safe, PICC-related complications can occasionally be serious. Abscess formation is a rare but significant event. This report describes a preterm neonate who developed a left flank abscess secondary to PICC line migration, emphasizing the importance of meticulous monitoring of catheter position and related complications. Case presentation: A preterm twin neonate born at 32 weeks was admitted to the NICU with respiratory distress syndrome. A PICC line was placed for parenteral therapy. On day 30, the infant developed lethargy and feeding intolerance, and sepsis work-up revealed infection. Despite antibiotic therapy, a warm, erythematous swelling appeared on the left flank. Imaging showed a large abscess with an air-fluid level, with the PICC tip located within the collection. The infant received Linezolid and Colistin, followed by surgical drainage, which yielded pus. Clinical improvement ensued and the neonate was discharged after completing antibiotic therapy. Follow-up imaging confirmed complete resolution. Discussion: PICC complications include secondary migration - reported in 4-12% of cases - which may lead to severe infections. In this case, secondary migration likely caused abscess formation, despite correct initial placement. Conclusion: This case highlights that even when initially positioned correctly, PICCs require continuous monitoring to detect potential migration and associated complications. Enhanced awareness, routine imaging reassessment, and standardized follow-up protocols can improve safety and outcomes in neonatal PICC management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.