ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2026
Antimicrobial Stewardship in oral and maxillofacial surgery: melting the iceberg.
Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Irrational antibiotic consumption contributes to antimicrobial resistance, adverse effects, and rising costs. Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) supports rational antibiotic use through restrictive and supportive measures. In oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS), antibiotic consumption is consistently high, and evidence-based guidelines are often lacking. We evaluated a multimodal AMS intervention on antibiotic use in an OMFS department. Design: Before-after study. Setting: OMFS department of a German university hospital. Patients: Hospitalized patients treated in the OMFS department. Intervention: For 12 months, the AMS team conducted weekly ward visits, providing recommendations regarding antibiotic therapy and surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP). In parallel, a mandatory consensus guideline covering these aspects was developed and implemented. Antibiotic use, prevalence, duration of therapy, and SAP before, during, and after the intervention were evaluated; clinical outcomes were not assessed. Results: Pre-intervention, over 70% of patients received antibiotics. Median duration of antibiotic therapy and SAP was 12 and 9 days, respectively. Antibiotic consumption reached 63.8 defined daily dosages per 100 patient days, exceeding national values (median 40.1). During the intervention, antibiotic prevalence decreased below 50% and the duration of antibiotic therapy and SAP was shortened to 9 and 3 days, respectively. Antibiotic consumption decreased by 26% whereas national values increased by nearly 50%. After weekly consultations ceased, antibiotic use rose again but remained below national levels. Conclusions: Antibiotic consumption is high in OMFS. Regular AMS support including consensus guidelines can reduce antibiotic use substantially and sustainably. However, clinical outcomes need to be correlated and adequately staffed AMS teams are needed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.