Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42130464›Full record

ReviewAustralian occupational therapy journal2026

Occupational intersectionality: Introduction, contextualisation, and relevance to occupational therapy practice.

Ted Brown, Diane L Smith, Aiko Hoshino, Risa Takashima

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Australian occupational therapy journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ted BrownDepartment of Occupational Therapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University - Peninsula Campus, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9403-5877
Diane L SmithDepartment of Occupational Therapy, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9133-3916
Aiko HoshinoOccupational Therapy Sciences, Prevention & Rehabilitation Sciences Course, Division of Integrated Care Sciences Technology, Department of Integrated Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1836-9688
Risa TakashimaDepartment of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2480-1983

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntersectionality asks professionals to consider the diverse sociocultural identities and positionings that may directly or indirectly impact the day-to-day occupational lives of individuals, families, collectives, and communities. Two or more identities or diversity factors may create compounding societal positions of marginalisation, discrimination, and oppression. Intersectionality and its outcomes, when viewed through a human occupation and occupational justice perspective, are termed 'occupational intersectionality'. As a critical practice perspective, occupational intersectionality offers occupational therapists a lens to identify identities and positionings that perpetuate inequities and restrict occupational engagement and participation for individuals, families, groups, and communities. PURPOSE: This article will (i) review the general concept of intersectionality; (ii) introduce and define the new concept of 'occupational intersectionality'; (iii) examine its relationship to social and occupational justice, including the Participatory Occupational Justice Framework (POJF); (iv) situate occupational intersectionality within the Canadian Occupational Therapy InterRelational Practice Process (COTIPP) and the Transactional Model of Occupation (TMO); (v) illustrate its application through a vignette; and (vi) contextualise occupational intersectionality by mapping identities, positionings, and diversity factors with the key elements of the COTIPP, TMO, and POJF. KEY CONCEPTS: The main concepts discussed include intersectionality, occupational intersectionality, occupational privilege and power, occupational oppression, and occupational discrimination, bias, and prejudice. The sociocultural identities and positionings that contribute to occupational intersectionality are discussed in the context of the POFJ, COTIPP, and TMO. IMPLICATIONS: Occupational intersectionality, as a professional stance, supports occupational therapists in recognising sociocultural identities and positionings of clients, families, groups, and communities that may hinder occupational engagement, participation, health, and wellbeing. Ongoing development, critical consideration, and practical application of occupational intersectionality are strongly recommended. Advancing this approach is essential for promoting social and occupational justice in occupational therapy practice. CONSUMER AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT: No consumer or community involvement took place in relation to the drafting of this manuscript.

Indexed as

Occupational TherapySocial JusticeHumansPrejudiceSocial GroupSocial IdentificationWorkforce Diversityintersectionalitymarginalisationoccupational bias & prejudiceoccupational discriminationoccupational justiceoccupational oppressionoccupational privilege & poweroppressionprivilege

Identifiers

PMID42130464
PMCPMC13173395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.