ReviewAustralian occupational therapy journal2026
Occupational intersectionality: Introduction, contextualisation, and relevance to occupational therapy practice.
Review in Australian occupational therapy journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Occupational intersectionality: Introduction, contextualisation, and relevance to occupational therapy practice.Australian occupational therapy journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntersectionality asks professionals to consider the diverse sociocultural identities and positionings that may directly or indirectly impact the day-to-day occupational lives of individuals, families, collectives, and communities. Two or more identities or diversity factors may create compounding societal positions of marginalisation, discrimination, and oppression. Intersectionality and its outcomes, when viewed through a human occupation and occupational justice perspective, are termed 'occupational intersectionality'. As a critical practice perspective, occupational intersectionality offers occupational therapists a lens to identify identities and positionings that perpetuate inequities and restrict occupational engagement and participation for individuals, families, groups, and communities. PURPOSE: This article will (i) review the general concept of intersectionality; (ii) introduce and define the new concept of 'occupational intersectionality'; (iii) examine its relationship to social and occupational justice, including the Participatory Occupational Justice Framework (POJF); (iv) situate occupational intersectionality within the Canadian Occupational Therapy InterRelational Practice Process (COTIPP) and the Transactional Model of Occupation (TMO); (v) illustrate its application through a vignette; and (vi) contextualise occupational intersectionality by mapping identities, positionings, and diversity factors with the key elements of the COTIPP, TMO, and POJF. KEY CONCEPTS: The main concepts discussed include intersectionality, occupational intersectionality, occupational privilege and power, occupational oppression, and occupational discrimination, bias, and prejudice. The sociocultural identities and positionings that contribute to occupational intersectionality are discussed in the context of the POFJ, COTIPP, and TMO. IMPLICATIONS: Occupational intersectionality, as a professional stance, supports occupational therapists in recognising sociocultural identities and positionings of clients, families, groups, and communities that may hinder occupational engagement, participation, health, and wellbeing. Ongoing development, critical consideration, and practical application of occupational intersectionality are strongly recommended. Advancing this approach is essential for promoting social and occupational justice in occupational therapy practice. CONSUMER AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT: No consumer or community involvement took place in relation to the drafting of this manuscript.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.