Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42130387›Full record

ArticleNew solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS2026

Local Perceptions and Discourses on Pesticide Health Risks in a Rural Community in Paysandú, Uruguay.

Nicolás Rodríguez, Andrés Trotta, Damián Herkovits, Frederico Peres

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in New solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicolás RodríguezInstitute of Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Universidad de la Republica Uruguay, Montevideo, Uruguay.ORCID 0000-0002-3674-9801
Andrés TrottaInstitute of Collective Health, Universidad Nacional de Lanús, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0003-4181-1494
Damián HerkovitsDepartment of Community Health, National University of Lanús, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Frederico PeresSergio Arouca National School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2715-6622

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Escalated pesticide use in Latin America has increased the number of people exposed to these substances. There are controversies about their health risks in rural contexts. This study, conducted 2018-2021, analyzed local perceptions and discourses on pesticide health risks in the Uruguayan agro-city of Guichón. We conducted 16 semi-structured interviews with agricultural, health, educational, and social actors. In addition, we visited the city and observed activities related to pesticide use. This study identified two discourses in tension. On the one hand, we observed statements that minimized pesticide risks and avoided responsibility for protecting health, safety, and the environment. These discourses contrast with those from a health-environmental perspective. They focused on several diseases and the loss of fauna, using complaints as the primary response. In conclusion, it is necessary to promote preventive practices in local workplaces, increase municipal control, and involve community-based actors in the analysis of pesticide health risks.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeOccupational ExposurePesticidesRural PopulationAgricultureFemaleHumansUruguayPesticideshealth riskspesticidesrural population.social perception

Identifiers

PMID42130387
PMCPMC13351106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.