ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2026
Drought and growing season phenology over 35 years modulates species interactions among domestic and wild herbivores.
Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Drought and growing season phenology over 35 years modulates species interactions among domestic and wild herbivores.The Journal of animal ecology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Domestic animals represent the largest mammalian biomass on Earth, creating an urgent need to understand their effects on native species. Environmental change may further alter these interactions, particularly for large herbivores that are highly sensitive to climate-driven resource availability. Interactions among assemblages of large herbivores include interference and exploitation competition, but the grazing optimization hypothesis paradigm suggests that interactions are often facilitative because defoliation from grazing stimulates compensatory regrowth of high-quality forage that benefits other species. We used 35 years of contemporaneous telemetry data on elk and domestic cattle to quantify spatial interactions within the context of climate-change-induced drought conditions. We fit step-selection functions to assess the immediate response of elk to spatiotemporal cattle distribution and tested whether drought and phenological advancement of the growing season-mediated interactions. We also modelled elk selection for pastures that were ungrazed, currently grazed or previously grazed by cattle to assess competition and facilitation. Our results refute the grazing optimization hypothesis and suggest elk are not attracted to areas previously grazed by cattle. Instead, elk avoided cattle throughout the entire growing season and at multiple scales. Elk were 2.9 times more likely to make movements to locations without cattle versus locations with 1 cow-calf pair/hectare, 23% less likely to use a pasture with cattle present, and 27% less likely to use one grazed by cattle earlier in the season, compared to an ungrazed pasture. After controlling for current season grazing status, elk were 30% less likely to use a pasture if it was grazed the previous year. Resource availability, influenced by growing season phenology and drought, mediated the magnitude of avoidance of cattle by elk. In the periods of most severe drought, elk reduced their avoidance of cattle ostensibly to seek out the remaining palatable forage regardless of cattle presence. Increased overlap between domestic and wild ungulates should be anticipated as climate change continues to increase the intensity and frequency of drought, which may result in decreased weight gain or fitness consequences to both species, increased potential for disease transmission, and more encounters between predators and domestic livestock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.