ArticleAnatomical sciences education2026
Using spaced repetition to teach histopathology significantly improves diagnostic skills: A randomized within-participant evaluation.
Article in Anatomical sciences education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The vast and rapidly evolving knowledge base in histopathology poses a significant challenge to long-term retention. We report here, in a randomized within-participant exposure-controlled evaluation, the efficacy of spaced repetition (SR), a technique for efficient memorization using repeated review of content according to a schedule determined by an algorithm to improve long-term retention. The study recruited trainees and certified pathologists. Participants were given access to an online e-learning module, consisting of a series of short videos, and were randomly assigned to one of two different sets of spaced repetition material. Three months after inclusion, their diagnostic performance was evaluated online using 20 previously unseen cases. The study included 337 participants in 2023. The evaluation and the feedback questionnaire were completed by 23% (79/337), with 58% (46/79) using the SR material. Learning via SR improved diagnostic performance both in accuracy and speed within participants: each participant scored significantly higher on diagnoses they had reviewed using SR compared to those they had not (mean score: 7.3/10 vs. 5.4/10; paired mean difference +1.9 points, p < 0.001, n = 42), and completed these same cases in significantly less time (paired median difference -1.4 min, p = 0.018). Participants were highly satisfied with this learning technique, with 90% expressing intent to reuse it. The findings suggest that SR can be used to improve diagnostic accuracy and speed of pathologists. SR has a strong effect on acquisition of diagnostic skills in histopathology and its use should be promoted in initial training and continuing medical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.