ArticleAnnals of geriatric medicine and research2026
Healthcare Providers' perspectives on the adoption of Smart Care Technologies in Korean Long-Term Care Hospitals.
Article in Annals of geriatric medicine and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMany smart care technologies have been developed recently, but it remains unclear which of them are necessary for use in long-term care hospitals (LTCHs).
methodsA total of 114 physicians, registered nurses (RNs), nurse assistants (NAs), and care assistants (CAs) from eight LTCHs completed a survey assessing perceived needs for 10 smart care technologies using 5-point Likert scales. One-sample t-tests, one-way ANOVA with Scheffé post-hoc tests, Friedman tests, and simple linear regression were used to examine differences by occupation and hospital characteristics. Additionally, focus group interviews with 10 participants were done.
resultsMean perceived need for smart care technologies was 3.99, with the highest ratings for smart mattresses (4.14), all-in-one patient transfer robots (4.09), and smart monitoring systems (4.06). Regarding the most preferred by occupation, physicians chose smart monitoring systems (4.19) and leg-care devices (4.19), RNs chose smart mattresses (4.11), NAs chose radar-based fall detection devices (4.22), and CAs chose all-in-one patient transport robots (4.36). Perceived need for smart care technologies was higher in LTCHs with lower monthly family fees and in those without a rehabilitation service, explaining 42.8% and 10.8% of the variability, respectively.
conclusionSmart care technologies were seen as necessary in LTCHs, but the types of technologies considered most important differed by occupational role and hospital characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.